Talk:Jolen

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jolen article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jolen/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Explanation of Rating ==

This article is very weak. It need's a lot of work, for it to get any rating above started. It has potential but it is going to need a lot of cleaning, more references, a better image, and more. It will probably need a partial or complete rewrite or restructuring to meet the qualifications for the next ranking. businessman332211 18:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please note I am not monitoring this page or the article on my watch list (Potentially). If you need to contact me about this rating or anything else, please do so on my talk page. businessman332211 18:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:45, 31 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic