Talk:Johnny Owen/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 09:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures edit

  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links edit

Prose edit

Lede edit

General edit

  • Johnny Owen was born John Richard Owens - do we need to mention both names here? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Given that he fought under pseudonym, a slight one admittedly, I thought it prevalent to begin the article with his full birth name, similar to Muhammad Ali, Sugar Ray Robinson etc. Kosack (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Underlinking is an issue in the body as well as the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    I've added one or two links where I can find them but there's not an awful lot really worth linking from what I can see. Kosack (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Penwaunfawr is a populated place, so should be redlinked. Surprised there's no article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) - LinkedReply
  • 12 Heol Bryn Selu on Gellideg housing estate - is that an exact address. I think this goes past our scope for biographies. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Dropped the number but I think the rest is suitable. Kosack (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Could you link box. I realise it's an article on boxing, but it's still worth doing, especially as box has other meanings. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) - LinkedReply
  • Amateur boxing could be higher in the section Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) - MovedReply
  • His record was strong but not without blemish - we shouldn't be stating this, unless a quote. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC) - TrimmedReply
  • MOS:FLAG says we shouldn't have flags without some sort of WP:ACCESS info for them. I'd remove the ones for the locations (as it's flag-cruft, and change the flagicon to {{flagathlete}}. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Removed flags. Kosack (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • The way you've done single linking is very weird. WP:OL doesn't say that you can't link every entry in a table, but if you don't, at least do it from top to bottom (actually, why isn't the table in chronilogical order?). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    It seems I accidentally linked the first mention while building the table from his first fight onwards which resulted in that error. Fixed now. Fighter's results are typically displayed in descending date order, from last to first. Kosack (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments edit

  • Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)
    • I've added some basic points above. I would like to see some additional links, and a bit more added to the lede. - on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Lee Vilenski: Thanks for the review Lee, I've responded to all of the comments above. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply