Talk:Johnny McNichol/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Very well written, couldn't fault it.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All challengeable claims are verifiably referenced.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Covers the subject as well as is possible.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias noted in the prose.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Image of Johnny seems suitably licensed.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Pass The Rambling Man (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply