Talk:John Worsley (British Army officer)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by BDD in topic Requested move 01 September 2013
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Worsley (British Army officer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Requested move 01 September 2013 edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved to John Worsley (British Army officer) by Noyster. --BDD (talk) 23:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
John Worsley → John Worsley (British army officer) – Other John Worsleys are:
- John Worsley (artist)
- Les Vandyke, singer & songwriter, also known as John(ny) Worth and John Worsley
- Rev John Worsley, an 18th century scholar, no article yet: see Israel Worsley - Noyster (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support move to John Worsley (British Army officer). "Army" is capitalised as British Army is a proper name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support move to John Worsley (British Army officer). Dormskirk (talk) 22:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Survey edit
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Note - John Worsley (scholar), the translator of the New Testament 1770, now has a stub. No opinion on the RM as yet. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- Any additional comments:
Move implemented as no objection raised. --Noyster (talk) 17:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.