Talk:John Tiptoft, 2nd Baron Tibetot

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

}

Untitled

edit

This article is simply of list of people related to the person in question and says nothing about what the person himself actually did.--Lairor 02:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Then it needs to be expanded. This is an article on a British baron therefore passes WP:Pokémon test by default.Tubezone 03:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, the pokemon test doesn't mean anything. As in, "This is an essay. It is not a policy or guideline." If the Baron Tibetot's are important people then perhaps they should be collected onto one page. But if this guy hasn't done anything more than be himself, I really don't think he deserves a page.--Lairor 03:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
It is not a good behaviour to massadd deletion proposals all around. I think you are upset because your application to move George Byron, 6th Baron Byron failed, but you should not vent this on other articles. ~~ Phoe talk 11:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC) ~~ Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Tiptoft, 2nd Baron Tibetot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply