Talk:John Taylor (Mormon)

Untitled

Some mention needs to be made about the controversy surrounding a revelation some say he recieved in 1886 providing for the continued practice of polygamy, by the Woolleys, albeit outside the church and jurisdiction of the Quorum of The Twelve, and the meeting some believe took place the day after he received it. Perhaps a dozen Latter day Saint groups trace their origins to their belief in that event.

Amongst the biographies of Taylor are -

The life of John Taylor,: Third president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints John Taylor: Mormon Philosopher, Prophet of God The Last Pioneer: John Taylor, a Mormon Prophet Witness to the Martyrdom: John Taylor's Personal Account of the Last Days of the Prophet Joseph Smith John Taylor: Messenger of Salvation Courageous defender of truth: The story of John Taylor --Tobey 04:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was close without prejudice. It appears that productive discussion is going on at the naming conventions page related to these parentheticals, but there's not a particular consensus for a certain title here at this time. Feel free to relist the discussion as an uncontroversial move if you're able to sort things out at the NC page. Dekimasuよ! 16:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

---

Why was this moved from John Taylor (Mormon) to John Taylor (Latter Day Saint) without discussion? I thought there was a consensus that the appellation (Mormon) is approrpriate for persons who were notable primarily for their membership in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and that the appellation (Latter Day Saints) was to be used for persons whose main notability was association with the pre-succession crisis split of the Latter Day Saint movement?? This uses neither—(Latter Day Saint) without the "s" ... Am I missing something? Rich Uncle Skeleton 01:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

It was me, and I appologize. It should be {Latter Day Saints} according to Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Latter_Day_Saints)#Disambiguation. but the term (Mormon) should be avoided altogether. Bytebear 03:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The conventions say -(Mormon) is to be used when the person is a leader of the LDS Church. I'm requesting a move back to John Taylor (Mormon) until a consensus is reached for change. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 08:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The conventions were "established" quickly with no real discussion, and they are inconsistant with other Latter Day Saint conventions. The problem with (Mormon) is that it is offensive to some Latter Day Saint groups like the Community of Christ. By say Mormon, you are saying that John W. Taylor is associated with the LDS Church which is correct, but ambigouous as he could also be assoicated with other Latter Day Saint movement groups, which is incorrect. I am against the term. I will also point out that this particular person is associated with other groups like the Community of Christ, and to say (Mormon) limits his involvement in them. (Latter Day Saints) or (Latter Day Saint movement) would be more appropriate. Bytebear 19:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bytebear (talk • contribs)

No, "Mormon" only applies to the LDS Church, and the naming conventions are clear about that. How will someone from the Community of Christ be offended? We are not associating any of their members with the term "Mormon" as this will only be used for a member of the LDS Church. If you can provide cited information that indicates that the Community of Christ considers this person to be one of their leaders, then "Latter Day Saints" is appropriate per the naming conventions.

The convention was not established "quickly"—the convention was proposed and stayed open for discussion for quite some time: from 2007-05-22 to 2007-08-02, to be precise. You did not oppose them at the time, so you are just as guilty for the "no real discussion" that you refer to. The lack of discussion about them was interpreted at the time as a general acceptance of them. This was supported by the fact that the proposed convention began to be applied fairly widely after they were suggested. I don't see much support for your proposal to change the conventions right now, so you seem to be alone in your opposition. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 00:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

From the Wikipedia article Mormon:

The term most often refers to a member of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), which is commonly called the Mormon Church. The LDS Church believes that "Mormon" may only properly be applied to its members, but the term is occasionally used more broadly to describe any individual or group that claims belief in the Book of Mormon, including other Latter Day Saint groups.

For this reason alone the term "Mormon" should be avoided in article titles, which is why the naming convention of Latter Day Saint articles was designed to do just that. From Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(Latter_Day_Saints)#Referring_to_members_of_Latter_Day_Saint_denominations:

Use of the term Mormon: Several denominations, including the Community of Christ, generally oppose the use of the word Mormon or its derivatives in reference to its members or theology.

For these reasons, which have been hashed out long before the policy on biographies was proposed, I oppose deviating from it in these cases.

Oh and the proposal was put forth in May, but the first response (mine, by the way) was posted only a few days ago. How is that time for discussion? Bytebear 01:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1. Let me try again: the term "Mormon" would NOT be used for a Community of Christ member. How will using the term Mormon for a person who is a member of the LDS Church offend someone from the Community of Christ? Do you understand the difference between the LDS Church and the CofC? Show me a source where John Taylor is described as an early CofC leader and I would agree with you that "Latter Day Saints" should be used. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 01:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

2. If no one responds for 10 weeks to a proposed convention and editors start implementing it widely, I think it's safe to say that it can be adopted. Why didn't you speak up during the 10 month period if you feel so strongly about this? Why is no one else opposing it, except you? Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 01:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1. It wouldn't, but it would offend other Latter Day Saint denominations that think Mormon should apply to them (FLDS for example). It's a catch 22. You can't use Mormon to describe general Latter Day Saint people, like John Taylor, and you can't use Mormon for LDS Church specific people like John W. Taylor. So instead you use (Latter Day Saints) for the former and (LDS Church) for the latter. This is for clarity as well, as many who are unfamiliar with the LDS Church think FLDS are also Mormons so it is better to use the existing naming convention, ranther than introduce "Mormon" into the naming convention. Bytebear 02:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

2. If I had seen the issue, I would have commented earlier. I don't hover over every article in Wikipedia. I feel strongly about it because it is a proposal that was "adopted" when someone simply removed the "Proposal" tag without any discussion at all. It doesn't match any other Latter Day Saint naming convention, and in fact contradicts them. Why are you so strong in using the term "Mormon" when every other proposal on Latter Day Saints says "Don't use Mormon". Bytebear 02:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1. I don't think FLDS Church members are offended that LDS Church members call themselves "Mormons". Where's your evidence for such a claim? I have set out my reasons above and on the discussion page for the LDS MOS for supporting "Mormon". In short, it's descriptive of the person, as a disambiguator should be. A person is not an LDS Church. That seems clear enough. If "LDS Church" is used, we'll have many variable disambiguators: "LDS Church leader"; "LDS Church missionary"; "LDS Church historian"; "LDS Church pioneer", etc. etc. Not good. Mormon works well in place of all of these. I'd love to hear your suggestion for an equivalent all purpose disambiguator which makes sense and doesn't call a person a church.

2. I would understand if it was a sudden change. 10 weeks, though? And it was being implemented by numerous editors. There is such a thing as passive acceptance, you know. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 02:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1. I didn't say they were offended. I said both groups use the term "Mormon", so would Warren Jeffs (Mormon) be as appropriate at Gordon B. Hinkley (Mormon)? Of course not. As was stated above from the Mormon aticle "the term is occasionally used more broadly to describe any individual or group that claims belief in the Book of Mormon, including other Latter Day Saint groups." Mormon is too broad for both of these people, and is not entirely accurate for either. Bytebear 02:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

2. I am allowed to be bold and challenge anything in Wikipedia at any time. If I had known about this earlier I would have challenged it then. Your second point is meaningless in terms of the rules of conduct of Wikipedia. Nothing is set in stone. Bytebear 02:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

1. If you didn't say that, then what does "it would offend other Latter Day Saint denominations that think Mormon should apply to them (FLDS for example)" mean? Bottom line: your all-purpose disambiguator for a member of the LDS Church that doesn't call someone a church is .... ?

2. I realise you have the right to do what you do—I was simply responding to your initial charge that this change was made "quickly". It was not. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 02:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok, here is my reasoning for not using "Mormon":

1. it is not specific enough
2. it is offensive to some groups
3. the naming conventions for all other articles say do not use "Mormon", because they have already hashed out this issue.

I am open to proposals, but (Mormon) is not an option. Here is my suggestion:

1. (Latter Day Saint) for general non-Denominations.
2. (Latter-day Saint) or (LDS Church leader) for LDS Church members
3. (Community of Christ) or (Community of Christ leader) for the CofC

Alternatively

1. (LDS Church <primary role or position>) i.e John Doe (LDS Church missionary)

Other examples:

1. (Latter Day Saint apostle), (Community of Christ prophet), (FLDS leader)

Bytebear 02:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Post these at the MOS page for discussion. Rich Uncle Skeleton ^(talk) 02:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

agreed, we should be discussing there. Bytebear 02:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Arrests made during the anti-polygamy crusade era

The John Taylor article presently states that hundreds of men and women were arrested for practicing polygamy in Utah. It would be good to have some documentation on this number. Also, I have never seen a reference to any woman's being arrested during that era. Did women also get arrested? If so, we need firm references to that fact. Thanks in advance to anybody who has that data and can furnish it here. Raymondwinn (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Allegations of Racism

Am i wrong to believe that John Taylor explicitly stated that Black Africans survived the Great Flood to be representatives of satan's horde, and that this was one of the guiding motives behind barring blacks from the priesthood until 1978? I believe i heard this on the PBS documentary. does anyone have additional information on this? if this is true, shouldn't it be listed on the page under a new title? Thanks, 24.131.64.81 (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Renaming

If anyone objects to renaming this article in conformance with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Latter Day Saints), please respond here. COGDEN 02:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Since there's no immediate objections, I'm renaming from John Taylor (Latter Day Saints) to John Taylor (Mormon). COGDEN 22:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Taylor (Mormon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://historytogo.utah.gov/strugglechrono.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on John Taylor (Mormon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080610001852/https://www.mormonfundamentalism.com/questions_concerning_the_1887.htm to http://www.mormonfundamentalism.com/questions_concerning_the_1887.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080503030422/https://www.fldstruth.com/sysmenu.php?MParent=HISTORY&MIndex=0 to http://www.fldstruth.com/sysmenu.php?MParent=HISTORY&MIndex=0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104233550/http://josephsmithpapers.org/person?name=John+Taylor to http://josephsmithpapers.org/person?name=John+Taylor
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007155758/http://www.moroni10.com/prophets_homes/John_Taylor.html to http://www.moroni10.com/prophets_homes/John_Taylor.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526085035/http://miloandrusjr.org/ to http://miloandrusjr.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Taylor (Mormon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526085035/http://miloandrusjr.org/ to http://miloandrusjr.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

This should be moved (2023)

I see this page was once in 2007 moved to not say "Mormon", and was moved back. Beyond the points that were made in that conversation, it is worth noting that the LDS church has since begun to discourage such use of the word "Mormon", and in light of that, it seems appropriate to move this article to not have "Mormon" in the title. -Ramzuiv (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)