This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
John Stonehouse is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am not sure that this archaic word is really in use any more. 'Lover' maybe ? Excalibur (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2015 (UTC) It;s still in common use in the UK in 2017. Cj1340Reply
I've heard it used several times this year. It's more precise than lover. Jim Michael (talk) 13:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An Australian policeman, given the task of watching Stonehouse, said that Stonehouse watched television with his hat pulled down over his ears and in dark glasses. This made the policeman suspicious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.201.140 (talk) 13:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It became apparent at the trial in the 1970's that Stonehouse had spent months rehearsing his new identity. This was not new in 2005. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.201.140 (talk) 09:18, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
"Although unhappy with the situation, the Labour Party did not expel him."edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The above passage was quoted, (more or less), with attribution to "Wiki", by MP Eddie Hughes in the House of Commons, beginning at 3:19 of this video.--Wehwalt (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've reverted an edit which included a link to an external website because it's a self-published source WP:SELFPUB, and appears to be complaints against other published sources which are critical of John Stonehouse. IndigoBeach (talk) 19:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
