Talk:John Ratcliff (bookbinder)/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Doug Coldwell, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Assessment
edit- Comprehension:
- Verifiability:
- Comprehensiveness:
- Neutrality:
- Stability:
- Illustration:
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has left no comments here | Undetermined |
- Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [Talk page]. Review is taken over.
Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Observations
editDocument statistics
- HTML document size: 92 kB
- Prose size (including all HTML code): 9536 B
- References (including all HTML code): 21 kB
- Wiki text: 15 kB
- Prose size (text only): 5629 B (961 words) "readable prose size" as per WP:SIZERULE
- References (text only): 2808 B
Page Information
- Page views in the past 30 days = 128
- 90 day page views = 420, daily average = 5 views
- Date of page creation = 10:21, 16 December 2006
- Date of latest edit = 07:10, 24 June 2022
- Total number of edits = 77 by 33 editors
- Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2013 ...
- Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted
- Internet Archive Bot has made 6 edits to this article.
Images
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 6B.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 1.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 3.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 4.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 5.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
- File:General Lawes and Libertyes, Massachusetts 1660.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
- File:Bay Psalm Book 1651.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
- File:New England Memoriall 1669.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
- File:Sewall's Commonplace Book.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
- File:Call From Heaven 1679 cover.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
- Images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales; Images have appropriate use with suitable captions
- It is reasonably well written.
- Later Englishman Ratcliff ... my sense is Englishman is superfluous.
- Done
- imported Morocco leather instead of domestic leather → imported Morocco leather instead of using domestic leather (consider)
- Done
- In the section Boston, Massachusetts do we need a link to the Boston page?
- Done
Unsure what the bullet point linking Holmes, "Collection of tracts" is present for.
- Done - The reference goes to page 15 which describes "A Collection of Tracts" (bottom}
underneath the second gallery is a link to Increase Mather 1670–80 → this is for ?
- Done - The reference goes to page 15 which describes "A Collection of Tracts" (bottom}
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reference 8 has been taken down by the Internet Archive
- Done
- Reference 23 goes to a blank page (view page source, there is nothing there)
- Done
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Considering the references and historical documents consulted, coverage is replete and focussed.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV is preserved in this article.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Yes, see above
- Overall:
- Is there any information on the life and works of Ratcliff after he returned to England?
- Done - there are no further records on him.{sfn|Holmes|1929|p=14}.
- Await responses to queries. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for review. I'll get started on the issues straight-a-way. BTW, your review does NOT show up on the article talk page. Do you know how to fix. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- The review was there originally; I removed it when I took over the review, for the sake of clarity. I am not the original reviewer. I do know how to put it there, although.
- @Whiteguru: All issues have been addressed. Did I get them all? Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk)
- @Doug Coldwell: Thanks for your work here. Another GA to your list. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)