Untitled

edit

John Peterman is one of the most famous catalog entrepreneurs in the world and deserves his own page separated from Seinfeld. Websiteadvice 01:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


Baseball?

edit

I have not found a record of a "John Peterman" ever playing for the Pirates. Either he used a different name, which should be stated, or it is untrue. Saruyama 17:56, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

His participation with the Pirates is metioned in many articles about him, although I've seen conflicting reference to it as "minor league" in some places but "major league" in most other places. See his autobiography description: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0735201994/102-1530894-2712949?n=283155
and also the write up of his visit to his college: (5 paragraphs up from the bottom): http://www.holycross.edu/departments/publicaffairs/hcm/spring01/features/spr01_fea61.html Georgeryp 10 March 2006


I don't believe John Peterman played a day of major league baseball. He uses it to sell his expensive garbage, most of which is made in China. He wasn't good enough to make it out of the minors. Yes, they do like to say he played second base for the Pirates but it isn't true. It's just like all his other fictional stories in his catalog.96.250.215.209 (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

2nd base or 3rd

edit

The article needs to make up its mind. Sfahey 16:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Peterman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Split "The J. Peterman Company" Section into its Own Page

edit

Hellow fellow Wikipedians,

I've suggested the section "The J. Peterman Company" be split into a separate page. I believe the section is substantial and has enough information about the company to be its own page. The rest of the article can stand by itself in detailing the life of John Peterman. In addition, "The J. Peterman Company" section disrupts the flow of the article about John Peterman as it switches perspective to the company's history and away from the entry about John Peterman. However, I would like your feedback and discussion about the split. Please take a moment to review and let me know what you think.

Thanks, Kelsey246! (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

     Update 07 December 2018: I have split the section to the J. Peterman Company page. See copy template below:  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelsey246! (talkcontribs) 16:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply