This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The latter paragraphs of the political views section is problematic because it relies exclusively on Papola's writings. If you consult the Murray Rothbard page, you'll note that best practice is to combine an independent RS with a primary source to explain an individual's views. This was done with the Washington Times citation, but it's not followed up with later claims. I'm not sure this is in line with Wiki best practices.
I also think that a heavy reliance on claims from Emergent Order and LinkedIn [1] are problematic because they are not verified by an impartial source. In fact, the sourcing for this article in its entirety appears questionable, given the heavy reliance on primary sources and presence of only one third-party RS. I suspect this page may require some major revisions. AttackTheRivers (talk) 03:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
