Talk:John P. Meier

Embedded citations

This article has an embedded link to an interview by Meier. I think it is against WP:CITE to have an embedded link in the body of the article.-Civilizededucation^talk 17:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Good point (more enthusiastically acknowledged b/c it was not my Edit, but hey). Let me try to address that (not immediately but in a bit) with a footnote. Better yet IMO would be a page-cite rather than a gloss of the book, even by the author, but I was unsuccessful in locating such a cite earlier. --Thomasmeeks (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John P. Meier/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

class="assess-ga " style="color:inherit; background: #66ff66; text-align: center; " | GA I think the article is ok, but I just listen to a lecture about his work, and all is in sync. This lecture I attended was done by a very serious research. Of course, it can be improved. It can be also useful to separate his biography of his work, but given the length of the article, I'll keep as it is now.

Last edited at 13:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 20:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

References/Notes

Almost everywhere these are found just before "External Links" - i.e. at the end where every "Ref" tag can be gathered together. If enything the works lists could do with some referencing! :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John P. Meier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060827023818/http://www.bsw.org/project/biblica/bibl80/Comm11.htm to http://www.bsw.org/project/biblica/bibl80/Comm11.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

"Critical reception" section that doesn't actually cover critical reception

More or less as per title. Reviews are mentioned (and cited), but the opinions of those reviews are not. While I'd love to rectify this myself, the first two reviews are behind JSTOR's paywall (and I fear my editing here will never reach the frequency required for Wikipedia Library access) and I can make neither head nor tail of the third one. - Dvaderv2 (talk) 20:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)