Talk:John Morrison (wrestler)/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Staring review. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • The article is reasonably well written, no spelling or grammatical mistakes, follows WP:MOS Jezhotwells (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • The article is well referenced, citations all appear to be from reliable secondary sources, no evidence of original research. I corrected two wiki redirects. I assume WP:AGF for those references that cannot be checked online. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    • The article is broad in scope and remains focussed on its subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
    • The article appears stable, no edit warring, co-operation by major editors, minor inappropriate edits by IPs or vandalism have been quickly reverted. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    • Appropriate images are used and tagged and licensed correctly. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    • I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Updates will undoubtedly be made following the subjects' career history as it develops. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply