Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Harrison49 in topic GA Review
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
 | John MacBride (Royal Navy officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John MacBride (pictured) defeated Hercules and Mars in a single battle? | |||||||||
And edit
...to my edit summary, I'll add that the milhist text is not even clear about whether it wants pictures to be 300px or just using "300px" as a sample of how you should write it - note that it's in a context teaching users what the proper script is. It could be just as example of size, not the size. Dahn (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- The article is well referenced.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article maintains a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are used effectively.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- A very interesting and informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
