Talk:John Lewis (computer scientist)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MJL in topic Requested move 14 October 2021
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Requested move 14 October 2021 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to John Lewis (computer scientist). per discussion (non-admin closure) –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
John Lewis (educator) → John Lewis (computer science educator) – Ambiguous with John Lewis (headmaster), amongst other articles. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 01:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Whilst I agree in principle, the new title should be
John Williams (computer scientist)John Lewis (computer scientist), which is what he actually is and a more concise title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)- @Necrothesp: Don't you mean John Lewis (computer scientist)? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)- Yup, too many Williams and Lewises! -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Does the subject's notability have any connection to work in computer science outside of education? I considered proposing John Lewis (computer scientist) but was apprehensive for the same reason that I wouldn't suggest that an article about a secondary-school physics teacher use the disambiguator "(physicist)". If the subject's notability extends beyond education, however, I would be whole-heartedly supportive of "(computer scientist)". 207.161.86.162 (talk) 02:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- We don't call academics a "physics educator" or a "history educator" because they happened to teach physics or history at university. We call them a physicist or historian. University academics have very different roles from schoolteachers - they all do research and writing as well as teaching. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Is writing and research part of his academic role in this case though? Given that he is titled as an adjunct, I wasn't sure that we could assume that. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 02:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- We don't call academics a "physics educator" or a "history educator" because they happened to teach physics or history at university. We call them a physicist or historian. University academics have very different roles from schoolteachers - they all do research and writing as well as teaching. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Necrothesp: Don't you mean John Lewis (computer scientist)? --Ahecht (TALK
- Whilst I agree in principle, the new title should be
- Contrary to what Necrothesp says, in academia, we do often call academics in some subject X an "X educator" when their primary contributions to X are in instruction or pedagogy rather than in research or practice. See Category:Computer science educators. But disambiguators should be as simple and general as possible and "computer scientist" is simpler and more general than "computer science educator", so I think it's a better choice in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support John Lewis (computer scientist) per David Eppstein. He might be notable as an educator, but he's a computer scientist first and foremost. (Alternatively, I'd suggest Not that John Lewis!, since half of the article is devoted to his identity being mistaken.)No such user (talk) 08:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.