Talk:John I de Balliol

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Valetude in topic Book-keeping records?

need of disambiguated location edit

Any location John de Baliol and suchlike is bound to be very ambiguate regarding this guy. Indeed, if John de Balliol is mentioned, at least I firstly think it's his son, the king. Therefore I believe it should be at least a dab page, and that the 5th lord need a disambiguate location, for which reason I now moved him to John, 5th feudal lord Balliol. A disambiguate location obviously benefits from that "5th" since that ordinal is a natural and scholarly used infopiece which makes him disambiguate from any other Balliol. I request everyone not to move this to any ambiguate location. Waimea 08:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

I argue: This guy (father of king John) has so little notability that his article is destined to be a stub into eternity. Does anyone have a contrary opinion, and what are grounds for such? Waimea 08:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Book-keeping records? edit

In 1265 Thomas de Musgrave owed him a debt of 123 marks. About 1266 Baldwin Wake owed him a debt of 100 marks and more.

Why is this significant? Valetude (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)Reply