Talk:John Heilemann

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Altamel in topic Some proposed changes

Some proposed changes edit

I work for John Heilemann. His current title for NBC News and MSNBC is "National Affairs Analyst, NBC News and MSNBC." He is also no longer at New York Magazine. I propose we change the first sentence of his page to: "John Arthur Heilemann (born January 23, 1966) is an American journalist and National Affairs Analyst for NBC News and MSNBC, where he mainly covers US politics.[1] TJDNYC (talk) 17:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/30/playbook-juice-may-30-238928. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

I'd also like to change the sentence that suggests John still hosts the Bloomberg TV and MSNBC program "With All Due Respect." That program ended in December 2016. I propose we change the second sentence of the second paragraph of his page to: During the 2016 election, He and Halperin co-hosted With All Due Respect, a political analysis show on Bloomberg Television and MSNBC.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/playbook/2016/12/newt-ups-his-speaking-fees-citing-insight-into-trump-clinton-trump-strategists-brawl-in-cambridge-exclusive-new-nrcc-executive-director-bday-harry-reid-217659)] TJDNYC (talk) 01:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


Because this fellow has taken to providing psychiatric analyses of Republicans, wouldn't it be fair to indicate where Heilemann received his psychiatric training (if any)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.216.213 (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Some proposed changes edit

I work for John Heilemann. The first sentence of this page is not accurate. There is no evidence cited that John Heilemann is an "American conspiracy theorist" or "propagandist." I propose making the first sentence be "John Arthur Heilemann (born January 23, 1966) is an American journalist and national-affairs analyst for NBC News and MSNBC." TJDNYC (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Done, the edit was a clear violation of the neutral point of view policy. Thanks for the alert. Altamel (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply