Talk:John Francis Jackson/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ian Rose in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Progression

edit
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]]

Technical review

edit
  • Citations: - the citation check tool reveals no errors (no action required)
  • Disambiguations: none found - [3] (no action required)
  • Linkrot: Ext links all work - [4] (no action required)
  • Alt text: All images have alt text (although this is not a requirement for GA anyway) - [5] (no action required)

Criteria

edit
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • I made one change which I think works better, but please check it to see that you're happy with it.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned):   b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):   c (non-free images have fair use rationales):   d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain':