Talk:John F. Harris

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

I am not sure whether the person mentioned above is the same one who works in Carlyle Group, because I have not seen any evidence in the official website of Carlyle Group, which contains a reference to John F. Harris.

see http://www.thecarlylegroup.com/eng/team/l5-team423.html

Please doubt check.

Thank you.

Yyz1984 19:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Template Error edit

For some reason the deletion template is producing an error. For the life of me I cannot determine how to fix it. Could somebody please assist? --Sue Rangell[citation needed] 20:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the PROD template as the justification was invalid. Per the WP:LOWPROFILE essay you referred to; "Persons who actively seek out media attention are not low-profile, regardless of whether or not they are notable." He appears to have been actively promoting both his books and his political website, so he fails the low profile test. If you are still concerned about the article though you are welcome to open an AfD debate. Road Wizard (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John F. Harris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply