Talk:John Deere
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 193.119.123.65 in topic Narrative control
 | Green magazine was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 June 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into John Deere. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The commas look out of place on the table under the 'Equipment divisions' tab edit
The commas look out of place on the table under the 'Equipment divisions' tab. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 21:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Narrative control edit
With the recent articles claiming farmers have had some big win with right to repair I would suggest people be on the lookout for PR people looking to influence narrative through modifying wiki pages.
This seems to already be happening with the no relevant section in this page about farm equipment being remotely shutdown in the Ukraine after Russian troops stole them. This section appeared direct onto the subsection about right to repair criticism, clearly designed to place a positive spin on remote shutdown capabilities with JD equipment. 193.119.123.65 (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Article issues and classification edit
- The article has a section "needs additional citations" and at least one Sept 2013 inline "Citation needed" tag. Fails B-class criteria.
- Citations: The B-class criteria #1 states;
The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.