Talk:John D. Lavelle

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified



Copyrighted Material? edit

It appears that fairly lengthy passages here are direct quotations from the article by the Casey's. While most or all of these cite the article, I'm not sure it is kosher to simply quote entire paragraphs without indicating they are quotations. I haven't checked other cited sources for possible copyright issues. Not fully knowing the rules, I'm not making changes right now - also, the material is indeed well worked into the article and it would be difficult to address without compromising a fairly informative article. Anyone know the best way to handle this? --CAVincent (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on John D. Lavelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply