Talk:John Bellamy Foster

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Can we get more that one reference that is not self-published? edit

If he is the editor of a magazine that publishes his books, that might that count as vanity publishing? 99.207.10.246 (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)KandyRainReply

He is not the owner of the magazine or the press, and not even the founding editor. (The magazine has been publishing monthly since 1949.) Thus, calling this "vanity publishing" seems a bit of a stretch, if you ask me.Desertpapa (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

photo lost down the memory hole edit

It appears to me that the visibility of the photo, File:John Bellamy Foster.png, (which I took myself and gave to the public domain) disappeared when revisor "Lucy e.g.p." made changes June 24, 2012, and that "CommonsDelinker", removed the broken image link on July 17, 2012. The result: no more photo, a poorer record, and a more misleading history which subverts the integrity of the Wikipedia. Restoring the photo to this article is beyond my patience. Robert B. Livingston (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on John Bellamy Foster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply