This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
What do we mean in this article when we say that Honter was a humanist? The nature of his humanism must have been different to that which is commonly understood by the word... unless I am missing something? I have seen it mentioned in other places, but not expanded on there either. :-/ Yaris678 (talk) 17:22, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Since I have had no reply, I have decided that the description that fits him best is renaissance humanist. He is of the right period, his works fit in with the thrust of renaissance humanism and he gets a mention in the (very long) title of this book. I have made this change.
