Secondary sources edit

The primary contributor to the article appears to be married to the subject. I believe the article to be objective, but in attempting to locate secondary sources in order to remedy its BLP unsourced status, I came up short. I did come across a mention in New Scientist from 8 April 1989 of an analysis Professor Rafelski performed in relation in the cold fusion controversy, but I don't feel competent to write about this or to place it in context. Will Orrick (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply