Talk:Joel Pett

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge the cartoon into the page of the author, for context and short text. Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

---

@The lorax: I propose merging What if it's a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing? into Joel Pett. There is only one secondary source establishing notability in that article, and it's only three paragraphs, one of which is a short lead, and one of which is mainly a quote by Pett. This page already includes most of the information mentioned on the comic's page anyway. WPscatter ^t/_c 04:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose. There’s indeed notability. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
  • From one news article? I certainly won't argue it isn't notable enough to mention on Wikipedia - hence this merge proposal and not an AfD - but in its current state it's better as a section of the author's article. WPscatter ^t/_c 06:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
• Support They are both very small articles which are unlikely to grow very big Chidgk1 (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
• Support per Chidgk1. Just not independently notable. ~ HAL333 02:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
• Support not because the comic isn't notable without leaning on the BLP article, but the other way around; the bio subject even says as much with the quote "I've drawn 7,000 cartoons in my life, but really only one". Arlo James Barnes 08:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
• Support per Chidgk1 and WPscatter's reply to RodRabelo7. Makes sense. El monty (talk) 12:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Support. I think there's simply too little content here to justify a separate article. Oktayey (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.