This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Not once but twice the article says that Senator Markley only got elected because of the 1984 Reagan Landslide. That certainly must have been a factor but the Democrat writer must concede that Markley must have had something to do with his election in 1984. Plenty of Republicans benefited from the coattail effect but fell short of being elected. -- JRM --75.130.91.73 (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
You seem to feel it says he "only got elected because of" the trend. The text actually says "due in part", which is very different. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
