Talk:Joe Graham

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Clean up

edit

The article needs way more clean up. This includes references, more internalization of links in the body, more wikilinks, and removal of "fluff" (writing that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, aka stick to the topic). Killiondude (talk) 07:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photo

edit

I've removed [[File:JoeGraham.jpg]] (a couple times now) because it appears to be copied from this page. The uploader claims to hold the copyright, but unless he took the picture himself (or he is Joe Graham), he doesn't hold the copyright. Please don't insert the photo again until this is resolved. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 01:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Graham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply