Talk:Joe Anyon

Little help

hi, this is cf38 offline. I was wondering if you could maybe help me Yamla (or a another Admin) I've added some sources and info but the info comes up in a little copy and paste page;

thanks

cf38 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.22.124 (talk) 17:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Protected for five days

I have protected this page for five days. It looks to be a fairly stable change with the exception of the edits that Cf38 (talk · contribs) is trying to make. These are inappropriate but well-meaning, so the protection is to give this user a chance to read and understand our policies and guidelines. --Yamla 14:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Cf38

Yamla, do you have it in for me? EVERY SINGLE article that I edit, that idiot who you are protecting by the look of it on his and my talk page had deleted! Everthing. The info I've put is the true, I haves sources, try PVFC and look at Joe Anyon's profile, and the fact that I was at the the game Mark Goodlad ruptured his achilles heel. AND, who don't you look on the Port vale site for the rest of the information about him being watched by premiership (If you're a yank, the premiership is the highest league a soccer team can play in) scouts! And I support Port Vale, have the refernces and sources, and I was actually there, never mind I'M A RESERVE PLAYER for port vale, and speak to these guys and play with them on a daily basis. If he does that one more time, I have my brother's (he's an IT manager with Wiki) backing in filing a complaint agains't you two. I bet you're siblings are'nt you!? You are sticking up for him.

Oh by the way, I requested this page to be reverted to MY version, since it's more informative and correct, and I have the proof. If you don't do anything Yamla, I'm going to make a complaint of unfairness. I work at Port Vale, so I know what's happned!!

Oh, and how are my articles 'Unapropiate'? It's all true, and you know it. I have proof, and I'm not resting until it's corrected. I'm not usually this angry, it's just unfair every single article I write is completley deleted by Dudesleeper. EVERTHING. And, if you look at his talk page, you'll see other complaints(still, he's probably deleted them now) of him DELETING WHOLE SECTIONS!

Cf38 17:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles are not the place to leave comments for other editors. This edit, for example, is inappropriate because you left a message for Dudesleeper right on the article. Additionally, you cannot protect pages because you are not an administrator. You have repeatedly been asked to provide reliable sources for your information. Please see WP:V and WP:RS. Just being right is not enough, the information must be verifiable. And you must provide these citations when adding the information. This has been repeatedly pointed out to you. Just stating that someone told you is not sufficient. I'm not sure who you are accusing me of being siblings with. I'm certainly not the sibling of Joe Anyon or of any editor on Wikipedia that I am aware of. --Yamla 17:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I removed the edit request. Yamla is an administrator and can determine whether edits are appropriate. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Anyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609230455/http://www.port-vale.co.uk/page/PortValeVolunteers/0%2C%2C10381~2060238%2C00.html to http://www.port-vale.co.uk/page/PortValeVolunteers/0%2C%2C10381~2060238%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430061956/http://www.port-vale.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10381~1641394%2C00.html to http://www.port-vale.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10381~1641394%2C00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)