Talk:Joan Hall
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Peter Ballard in topic Use of pollbludger
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Adelaide may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Use of pollbludger edit
I'm inclined to agree with the anon editor. If something is not carried in mainstream news sources but is carried by pollbludger, I think we need to tread very cautiously. In this case, pollbludger himself is only speculating, writing "Those who read between the lines could surmise that he (Joan's husband Steele Hall) blamed the episode on the federal member for Sturt, Christopher Pyne, a powerful moderate." We should directly qualify it (as in changing "was seen as machinations" to "was seen by pollbludger as machinations") or delete it. Peter Ballard 02:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)