Talk:João de Barros

Office-holder infobox?

I see an infobox was added in order to highlight he was Captain-Major of the Gold Coast (and, apparently, mistakenly attributed to Manuel I, although Manuel was already dead; Barros was an appointee of John III, whom he had served as a wardrobe-page in their boyhoods and was a close confidante; John III sent out a lot of his close servants to the overseas colonies in 1522 to "announce" the change of regime.) But is it even worth noting this in the infobox? His fame is primarily as a historian, a chronicler and man of letters, not a state officer. And, even so, he held far more important offices, e.g. factor-major of the Casa da India and donatary-captain of Maranhao (northern Brazil). His spell on the Gold Coast was youthful and uneventful. (Indeed, it is barely even mentioned in the body of the article).

I don't mind if a "succession" box for Captain-Majors of the Gold Coast is added at the bottom of the article. But I don't think the infobox should be dedicated to it. It should highlight him as a writer. That is what he is famous for. Walrasiad (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted to the previous infobox then, it is in fact more suitable, and kept the Office-holder infobox under the main infobox, as I think it looks better than placing it at the bottom of the article. Do you agree?XPTO (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, much better. Although why not just place it as a succession box at the bottom of the article, as is commonly done for titled offices? Walrasiad (talk) 00:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Done.XPTO (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks. BTW, that "Afonso de Albuquerque" is, of course, not the Afonso de Albuquerque (who died in 1515) but rather his son. Walrasiad (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on João de Barros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100607010225/http://purl.pt/7030/4/ to http://purl.pt/7030/4/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920064959/http://www.nead.unama.br/bibliotecavirtual/livros/pdf/DecadasdaAsia.pdf to http://www.nead.unama.br/bibliotecavirtual/livros/pdf/DecadasdaAsia.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326193420/http://www2.crb.ucp.pt/historia/barros%20china.pdf to http://www2.crb.ucp.pt/historia/barros%20china.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)