Talk:Jim Van Eerden
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
There are no longer any external links in this article. How do you remove the warning on the article that says external links are being used? thank you!Lah723 (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can someone edit the Jim Van Eerden page so that it is not flagged as violating Wiki's neutrality laws? Or help me understand this problem more? Thank youLah723 (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Untitled
editHello! I have done my best to start this page but would love any comments or feedback on how to make it better! Please let me know! Uhslax24 (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Suggest removal of this article from Wikipedia
editReading part of this article, checking a couple of references and looking briefly looking at the rest of them, then looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Your_first_article and its link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IRS which includes "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." gives me confidence to suggest this article be deleted.Detailaware (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it was pretty fluffy. I took a pass at cleaning it up. I think it would probably squeak through AfD, but I have been surprised before. Feel free to nominate if you feel so led. VQuakr (talk) 08:32, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
VQuakr, why did you delete whole sections of the article that were cited with reliable sources from collegeplus.org, Grove City College, Mediapost.com, Huffingtonpost.com, and finance.yahoo.com? Lah723 (talk) 19:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- As noted above and on your talk page, because this is an encyclopedia not Linked in or a webhost. We do not base articles on primary sources, and we write in a dispassionate tone. VQuakr (talk) 05:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)