Talk:Jewtopia (film)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I added Jewtopia (film) to Tom Arnold's Filmography section since it was never added before this morning 09:59 Tim Correll — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Correll (talk • contribs) 09:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I added Jewtopia (film) to Camryn Manheim's Filmography section at about 13:20 on Sunday, October 13, 2013 since it was never added before this afternoon. Tim Correll 13:23 Sunday, October 13, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Correll (talk • contribs) 13:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Lead
editJesseRafe, what do you think you are doing by making edits like this? I have seen thousands of film articles in my editing career, and believe me, it is perfectly "standard" for the lead of a film article to give the date the film was released. It's a basic piece of factual information that you have no business removing. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not in the way you initially did it. End of story. Please review the MOS before insisting your objectively incorrect information and subjectively poor style is proper. Bye. JesseRafe (talk) 03:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- My dear sir, if you did not like the way I initially did it, the proper thing for you to have done would have been to include the same information in some other way, not to summarily remove it from the article. Unless you have good information to the contrary, Jewtopia was indeed released in 2012, and so the information I added was not "objectively incorrect." Making weird and baseless accusations does not help other editors take you seriously, and neither do bizarre edit summaries like this. As anyone can see from looking at this history of this page, you were the one who removed basic factual information, not me. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. JesseRafe (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- I could not care less about your personal attacks ("someone as clueless as you") and incivility on a personal level, but I will take this opportunity to remind you that WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL are important policies and that you can be blocked for violating them. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Reading comprehension much? Your objectively false information was you blah-blah-blahing about "Whine! Many articles (stops to push glasses further up their nose) have this blah blah blah thing that I did, waaaa" which is not true, and also an example (if any, literally, any single article existed like as you say) of "well that article does it the wrong way, so this article should too". But I'm sure someone as clueless as you is well experienced in what it's like to not be taken seriously. JesseRafe (talk) 03:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Reinstating edit summary as Talk Page comment. This user has a serious problem with not being right all the time. Seriously???? Grow up. You started violating WP:CIVIL, etc, and you can't stand being informed that you're unequivocally wrong about this so you start name-calling and whining. "You have no business telling me I'm wrong", etc. Ha. Grow up,kid. Or is that not something you said? Had you approached this diplomatically from the beginning, you wouldn't have started an [incorrect] edit war over nothing. But nooo, you have to be the one to broach civility and then go and accuse the other appropriate-behaving, accurate-editting, and MOS-following editor of doing what you just did. Get over it. This is immature name-calling, and quite frankly beyond tedious. You wanted to make a change that had no business being made, and your edit was undone. That's it, move along. Stop making threats and ad hom attacks against other editors. JesseRafe (talk) 04:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Beyond tedious? Really? Then why so eager to make another talk page comment? I have taken this to ANI. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 04:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jewtopia (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110822094404/http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/19/3088604/jewtopia-movie-cast to http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/19/3088604/jewtopia-movie-cast
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)