External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewish-Polish history (1989–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jewish-Polish history (1989–present). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

no attempt was taken to combat antisemitism edit

How to combat antisemtism in a Communist land? Any written word was censored and universities were controlled by the party. Thousands of Poles were persecuted at that time - imprisoned or drafted to the army, so those not yet arrested didn't protest against censorship, economy and many other problems. Why should they have protested against antisemitism? Xx236 (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Irrelevant information in the article edit

The "Polish and Jewish views regarding one another" chapter begins with mention of Anti-Defamation league asking a tiny number of 500 Poles over the phone a question if the Jews were responsible for the death of Christ and brings the percentage results. This is a survey sample size of 0,00132% of the population. It is difficult to determine what was even the purpose of this question in any modern context or what was the League trying to determine with it (at least it is not clear from the text in Wikipedia). Then, the paragraph proceeds with mentioning a CBOS survey from 17 years ago on 973 people (0,00256% of the population), which was conducted in the context of wars in the Middle East back then. Is there any possible logical way to defend data with such abysmally tiny sample size? Regardless of availability (or lack thereof) of better data, I believe this should be mentioned as trivia at best or, preferably, removed. The margin of error from a survey conducted on just 500 people asked out of 38 000 000 must be colossal. This is an equivalent of basing an opinion of 76000 people on opinion of just one single person among them. Simultaneously, Wikipedia has a large audience, and such doubtful data here can wrongly influence opinions of people reading it. CanisV (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Section "Polish and Jewish views regarding one another" needs updates about recent years. edit

The lede of the article "The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland" by Rafał Pankowski writes: "The surge of hostility to Jews and the Jewish State in the Polish media and politics in early 2018 took many observers by surprize. <...> It was also a great shock because for many years, bilateral relations between Poland and Israel had been especially cordial and fruitful".

I added the above into our article, but I don't have access to the full source. Can someone elaborate on what exactly happened? Lembit Staan (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply