Talk:JetGo

The article does not yet demonstrate that JetGo Australia is sufficiently notable to warrant its own article on Wikipedia. As a result, the article is vulnerable to deletion. Users with access to reliable published information about JetGo Australia should take action to enhance the article with information, and sources, that demonstrate the company is notable in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines at WP:CORP. Dolphin (t) 03:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

JetGo logo

Out of interest the logo used is not from the airline website which uses the same image but styled "JetGo", if we are using non-free images then we should use the correct one. MilborneOne (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

AfD

This article should be put up for deletion, I'll do it later. ★★RetroLord★★ 11:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

I believe this article should be allowed to remain. While most of the sources are from various regional newspapers and national magazines and they seem to verify much of the information from the primary source (company website), which does establish some notability. There is a significant amount of discussion regarding this company on forums/blogs that are not acceptable sources to further demonstrate community interest. It may be borderline weak against the notability criteria, but certainly will compare more strongly as the company grows and the article evolves. Can you please clarify on what grounds you feel it should be moved to AfD, or suggest how it can be improved further to justify its continued existence? Dfadden (talk) 15:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

A mention in a rural newspaper and the possibility of company growth is hardly a sign of notability. Lets be honest here, they are leasing a few small planes, they aren't some giant airline. ★★RetroLord★★ 12:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)