Talk:Jessica Phillips (actress)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion edit
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because...she's a real actress. I can take the Emmy material out if that is what is causing the issue. I just added it to add more material.
Contested deletion edit
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Anonymous (talk) 04:58, 18 June 2016 (UTC)please this is my first page I created on wiki. This actress was perfect because she's all over wiki but doesn't have a page yet. I am just learning, but I fixed everything. Please don't delete all my work before I can fix it.
I think I have fixed everything. Any notes would be appreciated though.
Page restored edit
For what it's worth, I restored and rescued the article. I basically stumbled upon it, following the lead from Talk:Jessica Phillips (cyclist)#Requested_move_14_May_2018, and discovered that Jessica Phillips (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been deleted... twice. I don't think that this old version on which I based the current article, last edited by TomStar81, was worthy of WP:G11, and I'm sad to see yet another potential good-faith contributor, User:MSHouck driven away by overzealous tagging and deletion. No such user (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- For the record, it started off as an A7 article, and it still doesn't really indicate why its subject is important or significant. There's some ascertation that she is a rising star, but from where I sit she still falls short of A7 with regards to having an article here. I'm not objecting to the restored article per se, just noting that she could be a little better covered if shes gonna be on here. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well, she certainly isn't an Angelina Jolie, but cited information that she had a lead role in multiple Broadway musicals and was a guest star in multiple episodes of a nationally-broadcasted TV series an A7 maketh not. At minimum, notability should have been tested at an AFD. No such user (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2018 (UTC)