Talk:Jessica Kingsley Publishers

Latest comment: 2 years ago by PigeonChickenFish in topic Notability

Notability

edit

This publisher has questionable notability as a topic for a stand-alone article.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It was created by an SPA during their brief presence in 2006, and I don't see the topic as passing the WP:GNG, or the specific guideline for companies and organizations. This should probably be deleted. Mathglot (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am not familiar with the concept of something losing notability here. If the article once passed notability, shouldn't that hold value and precedence? How does one loose notability? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply