This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Wikipedia article or official campaign website?edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I question the relevance of many of the elements listed in this article. In particular, polling or positions defended as a city council (i.e. speed limit, street parking.) are topics that extremely local and not really informative about the state of the city. And if it is deemed relevant to better understand the personality of Jeromy Farkas, it should not take that much space and could be all condensed in one paragraph. In general, a large portion of the article does not sound very encyclopedic. And in the context of an upcoming election, it looks like the purpose is more to make sure that voters know quickly about his position on many divisive issues (which is useful but not the role of Wikipedia) rather than informing readers about who he is. Xzimnut (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
I agree, I think it could be condensed and made more neutral. Poecile.atricapillus (talk) 17:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. The 2021 platform section was particularly excessive - I've summarized it to a few sentences. -M.nelson (talk) 09:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
