| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled edit
I haven't seen Jermaine Lawson on TV, but User:Dingbatdan appears to have overstepped WP:NPOV here.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't understand - is it in reference to his action? Because I was merely stating that he was reported - I am making no judgements Dingbatdan 14:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
No, I mean the phrases "exploded onto the scene", "extraordinary figures" and "superb haul", which are rather suggestive and not particularly neutral.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 05:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
It's undoubted that 6/3 is an extraordinary haul - it is the cheapest 6-for in Test history and unlikely to be replicated. Furthermore, in one's third match (regardless of opposition) it is definately making a mark quickly - hence 'exploded' ie. he became known very quickly as a result. And 'superb haul' references a 7-for against the best team in the world, which is no mean feat.Dingbatdan 04:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I did a bit of a rewrite to try and make it more NPOV. What do people think? -- Deville (Talk) 12:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
No problems here, thanks! Dingbatdan 10:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
NPOV tag edit
Although marked as December 2007, that's only when the tag was dated; it's been there undated a lot longer. Given the discussion above, does it actually need to stay now? Loganberry (Talk) 14:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)