 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability edit
See WP:BIO and WP:V. No reliable documentation of assertions in article. No indication that this author's "publication" meet industry standards (for example, qualifying for SFWA membership). Avt tor 22:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
This is a vanity press author and not notable in any way. If he qualifies by paying to publish his books the door is open for thousands more.Marky48 16:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
While his first book came from a POD press (not the same as a vanity press), his most recent books are from Thomas Dunne Books, an imprint of St. Martins, which is certainly a 'real' publisher. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.188.33.26 (talk) 20:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
After 60 published novels and short stories spanning 15 years, multiple Audible Best Sellers and a New York Times Best Seller. I think Jeremy Robinson's notability is currently unquestioned. User:AlexMaddern 07:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Have tagged for notability as I can't find significant coverage from reliable sources of this person. I see that there has been a previous AfD with outcome of Keep. Tacyarg (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Removing unencyclopedic content edit
I removed the "first novel" stuff because none of it really seemed very encyclopedic or notable in the long term. As far as the more famous authors go, we don't note every time they hit the bestselling lists. It also sounded much like an advertisement and there really wasn't any way I could rewrite the section to ensure that required a whole section and remained notable and didn't sound like an advertisement. I also removed the "inspired by" part since we really don't need a list of who this guy was inspired by. That isn't the norm for articles of other authors and it just made this seem a little more like something copied off of the author's site. I also moved the "How I Got Published" part to the non-fiction section. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
- I did try to find a valid reference to the "#1 Lulu and B&N book", but the only things that linked to this was the wikipedia entry itself, the author's website, and a few blog entries, all things that I can't really use as a reference. Tokyogirl79 (talk)tokyogirl79
Should Kaiju Novels not be "Stand Alone"? edit
I haven't read them yet, but Amazon lists both as having "(a Kaiju Thriller)" subtitles and the blurbs say that they both feature the same main character and the second novel's blurb makes reference to "Nemesis." It certainly seems like a new series to me, can we get someone to confirm this if it's correct? 63.224.159.207 (talk) 00:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
The Nemesis Saga currently spans five novels and a prequel. Seems like a series to me. User:AlexMaddern 07:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)