It looks like user Persephone1021 was trying to update the article to reflect the current programming of the Charity but had his/her revisions reverted and reported for vandalism. What is going on & who is this anonymous user with the snarky vendetta against a charity just based on its name? Arianna (talk) 03:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, my bad, I just looked over the history of what went on with the edits and can see why s/he was reported for vandalism. Still looks more like really bad inexperience/unfamiliarity with wikipedia's guidelines than intentional malice, though. Would it be alright if I tried to overhaul the article? Googling seems to suggest the organization has become more prominent/changed dramatically since I first posted this article. I've been meaning to clean it up for years and never got around to it. Arianna (talk) 03:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I'm officially the worst wikipedian ever - I said I was going to deal with this repeatedly over the course of several years and have failed. I'm going to do a complete overhaul of the article today, so if anyone notices radical changes and/or doesn't like what has happened, please message me and we can work together! Arianna (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Alright, I tried to basically fix everything that was wrong - got rid of the history section, actually used a tonne of refernces, I basically copied the format of EGALE Canada's wikipage, since it is a similar organization and doesn't seem to have had the problems this one has. Please let me know what you think!
Arianna (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
