Talk:Jennifer Webster-Cyriaque

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
WikiProject iconWomen in Red: Black women (2022)
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the Black women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in February 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Webster-Cyriaque

Created TJMSmith (talk). Self-nominated at 00:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Article is new enough, long enough and neutral. The hook is cited and interesting. The photo is free, looks good and in the article. My only concerns are paraphrasing and sourcing. There's too much close paraphrasing of these sources [2], [3]. It also seems like the article is a little undersourced, there's 3 refs right now, one of which is her doctoral thesis. I'm not sure if it meets notability or verifiability guidelines like this. It would be good to have more secondary sources before putting the article on the front page. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • @BuySomeApples: care to take another look? I have added a bit and copyedited. Earwig still reports similarities but they are mostly noun phrases. I have also added another source which adds no new text but it is a third party source and its no longer an orphan. Hope @TJMSmith: can overcheck my changes. Victuallers (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply