Talk:Jenna Miscavige Hill

I don't know what prior message

I don't know what prior message mean by "redirect on non-existing page". There are of course empty studs wiki links that need time to finish. Wiki pages are full of inter links that do not exist, which encourage people to write the topic. As for the wikinews tag, it's a direct tag copied from a completed article. It doesn't turn up as expected, needing time to fix, and usually editors come in to help rather than delete it.

The reason it was deleted before was that someone moved the article to Jenna Miscavige Hill where it was then deleted under the criteria for speedy deletion, A7, for not establashing a claim to notability. As that article was then deleted, the redirect from the move was then pointing at the deleted page and so was deleted under the criteria for speedy deletion, R1. As it is, I think it just about passes A7 personally, but might not survive a deletion process. I would recommend you add a few more sources to establish notability in order for this to be kept; for now I've just added the {{notability}} tag to alert other editors that this may not meet the criteria. It is not a deletion proposal, but I've added this to my watchlist to keep tabs on it, see whether it will pass the criteria at a later date.

On an unrelated note, could you please sign your posts by typing four tildas at the end of your posts on talk pages? Just like the following: ~~~~. It makes identification of the author of comments infinitely easier. Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 23:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

notibility

She is certainly notable. She is the niece of the head of a religion with many members all over the world. Her parents and herself leave the church, which is significant events. New York Post is a very reliable source, you can check the Wikipedia page about it. The wikinews cited is also a well written article, objectively passed all the wikinews scrutiny, with the NYP and supporting sources. The only challenge is the length and the number of reliable sources. By definition these have nothing to do with notability, unless we are playing the numbers game. Hope I'm entering this in the right place. Anwk (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I've added a few more refs, which should take care of the notability problem. The next step is to use them as <ref>notes</ref> to source paragraphs. AndroidCat (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks great now. Fwiw, my original concern was that just because her family is notable doesn't mean she is, but with the new refs it's pretty obvious she passes WP:N. Good work! :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 01:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability

Article seems to be more about things she has Said more about her. I am seeking sources for more about her The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Disclosure: I am an anti-Scientology protestor. I am just trying to make sure things get deleted which shouldn't. Jenny is notable. There is an ABC Nightline episode made with/about her. This is the announcement at ABC's site: http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=4716462&page=1 This is the actual broadcast: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJu-j4aa90Q. I am not a wikipedian, I'll try to add correctly in the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.147.221.167 (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC) Edit: I've tried adding in the main article that she was interviewed by ABC Nightline, but don't understand how I should do that.

Jenna Miscavige Hill is a founding member of the only website where an ex-Scientology kid can go to safely share their story and find help. Jenna bravely started this website with two other ex-Scientology kids at the beginning of Project Chanology. They went against everyone and everything in their lives. Jenna and her husband endured many torturous hours of Scientologists badgering them. She and her husband stood firm. Jenna is the niece of the current head of Scientology and nothing would make the Scientologist happier than to have her wiki page removed. As an anti-Scientology protester and advocate, I can tell you that Jenna's website is the ONLY website I have been able to consistently recommend to anyone wanting to know the horrors of Scientology.

I see no reason why someone as important to the Anonymous anti-Scientology movement should have their wiki page removed. Keep Jenna's wiki! 00:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalaland317 (talk • contribs)

Obviously, Jenna is notable per WP:HOTTIE. But seriously, that's about as relevant as saving that she's notable due to one's concurrence with her critiques and disapprobation of Scientology. What is relevant is WP:GNG. The amount of media coverage she's received, not in relation to a single discrete event, seems to satisfy that standard of notability. "Only notable with respect to Scientology" arguments for non-notability seem to be the flip side of the "notable due to critiquing Scientology" claim, and just as meritless, since inclusion in Wikipedia does not require multi-factorial notability. One's endeavors in relation to a single subject matter are sufficient where coverage in WP:RS is adequate. Chester Markel (talk) 06:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Photo

I'm thinking of making this look a bit better, adding headings and maybe quotes but I can't seem to find a photo that is without copyright. I've tried the creative commons search. Is there another obvious way to get one or maybe another editor has one? Thanks Mramoeba (talk) 15:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

I've just about finished the rewrite. Unfortunately I haven't been able to get a photo which I have to admit is disappointing. If any editor is able to help to provide one I would be grateful. I will see if a book cover is the best I can do for now. Mramoeba (talk) 09:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Jenna Miscavige Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/newmedia/la-et-scientology3mar03%2C0%2C4668513%2Cfull.story
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313095246/http://people.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1390185.php/Family_feud_in_Scientologys_upper_ranks_exposes_more_oddities to http://people.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1390185.php/Family_feud_in_Scientologys_upper_ranks_exposes_more_oddities
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307065203/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5heELOXbk_8qWowwJGtd3RrEXdqgQ to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5heELOXbk_8qWowwJGtd3RrEXdqgQ
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514022100/http://www.thehoya.com/node/15864 to http://www.thehoya.com/node/15864
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101230222032/http://technorati.com/entertainment/glosslip/article/jenna-hill-miscavige-helps-out-children-trapped-by-scientology-with-new-site-exscientologykidscom to http://technorati.com/entertainment/glosslip/article/jenna-hill-miscavige-helps-out-children-trapped-by-scientology-with-new-site-exscientologykidscom

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenna Miscavige Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161104024253/http://www.scientologynews.org/statements/scientology-statement-jenna-hill-book.html to http://www.scientologynews.org/statements/scientology-statement-jenna-hill-book.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)