Talk:Jeannie Suk
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Jeannie Suk Gersen, Title IX edit
- The Revolt of the Feminist Law Profs — 12 August 2019
In my view, it's just about impossible that a profile at this length, in this venue, does not render Jeannie Suk Gerson as she would render it herself.
The article, itself, is an awesome addition to the discussion around Title IX. Suk Gerson's central involvement in Title IX deserves mention both here and there. — MaxEnt 15:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Too much detail on children and stepchildren? edit
Does the number of stepchildren belong in the article at all? It isn't sourced, and the main noteworthy public fact is that Suk was married to one well known professor (Feldman), then another (Gersen).
I reduced the information on her children to the number of kids, per the page on Feldman (from which I removed the names of the children; they are private citizens below the age of majority). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.149.246.232 (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)