Talk:Jean van Heijenoort

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 109.158.118.141 in topic straitened

revision edit

I, the Concerned Cynic, chanced upon this article in December 2005 and promptly revised it extensively. I am privileged to own a copy of Feferman's biography. VH's personal life was a stickier wicket than I let on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.36.179.65 (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2005

Van vs van edit

The body text of the article, as well as the Math Genealogogy page, capitalize the Van. I have thus, as was done for Townes Van Zandt, capitalized the V in the page title, and alphabetized the sort keys under Van Heijenoort. grendel|khan 13:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

His name is Jean van Heijenoort, not Van Heijenoort. See the frontice-page of his Source book (Harvard University Press), for instance. I'm not sure what the English-language rule is about lowercase v when "van Heijenoort" starts a sentence, although my gut says you don't fiddle with a man's name, rules or no rules. But I'm going to fix the title. BillWvbailey (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
The current ratio is about 15,000 wikipedia articles with titles like John von Neumann with a lowercase "v", and 4,000 with titles like "Yuri Van Gelder" with an uppercase "V". Most (all?) style guides capitalize the "V" when it starts a sentence, just as the capitalize an other noun when it starts a sentence, but that is a different issue because we have "Jean" before "van" in the title here.
The math genealogy project isn't a source for canonical spellings, and the body text of this article does not capitalize the 'v" when it doesn't start a sentence. A scan through google books shows many, many books that don't capitalize the "v". So I agree with Wvbailey and I'm going to move the article to the other capitalization. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

jean van h edit

hey wasts up my name is jean van i was born yesterday in the hospital u was born and i luv u —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.235.222.10 (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Book about JVH's work edit

reviewed here. Looks interesting. Maybe something from the review can be worked into the article. The book should also be referenced. Modern Logic 2/3 (1992) also has a lot of material. [1] Actually more stuff is easy to find, so the article can be expanded some. I don't know if I'll attempt this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.241.238.233 (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

straitened edit

What does the word mean in "Van Heijenoort came of age in straitened family circumstances"? I think it should be replaced, but not knowing what the intention is... Jd2718 (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

"straitened circumstances" means that they didn't have much money. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Jd2718 will find a definition here https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/straitened_circumstances. 109.158.118.141 (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Minor factual error edit

The anthology 'From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931' does not end with Gödel's paper, it ends with Herbrand's 'On the consistency of arithmetic'. 109.158.118.141 (talk) 16:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply