Talk:Jean de Florette/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Initial review
editThe article looks quite reasonable.
It's some what under wikilinked, so I've added a few as I've skimmed through/read the article; and in places the article needs minor points of clarification. I've also added the {CinemaofFrance} flag which was missing from this article, but was in use in other articles in this category.Pyrotec (talk) 21:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
GAR
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations, I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)