Talk:Javine Hylton/Archive 1

Archive 1

Fake Myspace page

I think this section should be removed, as the person on said page is clearly not Javine Hylton, nor would I say she is pretending to be her. Otherwise she wouldn't say she's 15 from Texas, and have a photo of herself. Any objections? — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Reality show winner?

is reality show winners realy a correct category for javine???--Matrix17 17:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, she won The Games on Channel 4. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

shit!!!

this article is shit!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.0.100.120 (talk) 18:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

Chart Success

I'm from Australia and we've barely heard of Javine, let alone for her to have so many hits here. The Australian chart position are extremely inaccurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.241.166.170 (talk) 13:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

Personal Life

The second paragraph seems like it's meant for Alesha's page, not Javine's 24.148.81.91 02:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Javine2.jpg

Image:Javine2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Photos of the lovely Javine

What's the story with the images? I have a couple of photos of Javine which I got from her website. Surely no-one would object to their being used here?  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 19:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

So who removed the pic? And why?  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 22:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Heritage

This article claims Javine's father is "Afro-Caribbean" (which should anyway be "African-Caribbean") but the source it cites doesn't say that, just that Javine is mixed-race and that her mum is white. Anyone object if I change this to reflect the source?

I also removed the para at the top of the talk page, which was potentially libellous. Although funny ;) Beantrees (talk) 13:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Javine Hylton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Hi. I will be reviewing the Javine Hylton article. Please give me a couple of hours to read through the article and collect my thoughts. I usually print the article out and go over it with a pencil, and write my notes on paper before typing them up, so please be patient. I'll post my review and any comments when I'm done. Regards, Matthewedwards :  Chat  19:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   and remains her biggest hit to date. phrases such as "currently", "as of" and "to date" are likely to age and should be avoided. Can the sentence be recast?

   The remainder of the prose doesn't really meet the Good article criteria. There are one- or two-sentence paragraphs, structural errors, etc. It needs a really good copy edit to improve

   B. MoS compliance:

   Please see WP:OVERLINK. It isn't necessary to link common terms, words, places, such as London, English, singer, UK, model, Kiev, white British, black people, etc etc

   Avoid WP:WEASEL words, such as In a potentially risky move --

   Avoid WP:PEACOCK terms, such as biggest hit

   'wardrobe malfunction' should be in double quotes

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   There are many sentences that are tagged as needing citations

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Generally, tabloid newspapers such as The Sun, The Mirror, News of the World, and Now magazine are not considered reliable sources. I'm not satisfied that http://www.ilikemusic.com/music_news/-496 is a reliable source either.

   C. No original research:

   Too much of the article is unreferenced, so much of it may be WP:OR

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   It would be interesting to read how she performed in Popstars, and what songs she sung. The same for Eurovision. The article merely glances at what she's done, without really going into any depth. See Clay Aiken as a good example of what should be included.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   The image needs Alt text

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Due to the fact that the article is tagged in numerous places with {{citation needed}}, the article does not meet the GA criteria, and has been "quick failed". I did conduct a review anyway, so hopefully editors will be able to use this GAN as an opportunity to improve the article. Good luck, Matthewedwards :  Chat  22:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

   For the record the article was nominated by a sockpuppet of a blocked user so I am not too surprised it failed. Thanks for the review anyway. Camaron · Christopher · talk 10:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)