Talk:Javagal Srinath

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified



Untitled

edit

The following

  • Srinath has had to shoulder the burden of the strike bowler almost single handedly and had to undergo an operation on his right shoulder in 1997.
  • Spearheading the Indian pace attack for numerous years, Srinath rarely let down the cricket fans in the country. Whether in Test cricket or the limited overs game, whether in making the initial breakthrough with the new ball, breaking up a vital partnership in the middle order or cleaning up the tail, Srinath could always be depended upon to deliver the goods. Bowling with a smooth action, the `Karnataka Express' was always able to extract pace and bounce from even docile wickets. Perhaps the finest tribute to his pace bowling skills is the fact that a large percentage of his impressive bag of international wickets have been taken on unfriendly tracks at home. On the bouncy tracks in Australia and South Africa and in green conditions in England, he was more often than not the leading wicket taker. Srinath frequently displayed the entire repertoire of the fast bowler's art - the dipping inswinger, the late outswinger, the deadly yorker, the whistling bouncer. At the same time he never compromised on the basic qualities of bowling - line and length.
  • He retired from international cricket after the 2003 world cup in South Africa in which he gave a stellar performance until the final against Australia, where he appeared to crumble under pressure, conceding an alarming 87 of his 10 overs. He is remembered as a trailblazer for Indian pace bowling. Strongly built and lightning in his youth (there are reports that he clocked 157 km/h in 1996 V South Africa), he was for a decade the lion of India, striking fear into the hearts of opposition Batsmen from Brisbane to Bangalore. Despite being one of the best fast bowlers the World and India had ever seen it was unfortunate that he was never given the credit he deserved

Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The last bit is most definitely POV and reads like a fan-club posting, so I've summarily removed it. Some of the other sections are more of a judgement call, so I've left those to be dealt with by editors who know Indian cricket better than I do. Loganberry (Talk)
Thanks to the person who left the (unsigned!) comment on my Talk page about this. I think what I said above is a little unclear, so I'd better clarify: I took out the last bit about "lion of India" and "unfortunate that he was never given the credit he deserved" as they are blatant POV that doesn't need to be replaced. I've left the rest alone, ie the para beginning "Spearheading the Indian pace attack" since I feel that needs to be rewritten rather than just deleted, and I don't know enough about Indian cricket and Srinath in particular to do that fairly. Loganberry (Talk) 14:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
I have modified the below statement in the intro section:
"He was India's finest fast bowler in the 1990's. He is India's fastest bowler(1996 South Africa Tour) and the only Indian fast bowler to have taken more than 300 wickets in ODI's. If not for the sub-standard Indian fielding unit of the 1990s, he would have ended up with a phenomenal record."
The last sentence again being a POV possibly from a fan.

Cleansquad (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

New Ball

edit

He didn't take new ball against South Africa according to this

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Javagal Srinath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Javagal Srinath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply