Talk:Jasz people

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2602:306:C4CE:9AF9:CCAA:709:3521:C041 in topic The Name 'Jasz' Isn't Related to the Name 'Jazygian'

Requested move 12 July 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 18:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


Jasz peopleJász people – That is the correct spelling in Hungarian, also it is spelled in the body, and in Jász (redirect should be the opposit way) JSoos (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Why does the History section make the discredited claim that 'Jasz' is "certainly related" to 'Jazyg-' when the Geography section has already noted the claim is "erroneous"? The Jazygians were Sarmatians, as were the ancestors of the Jasz/Ās, but beyond that there's no known special proximity between the two groups, nor any etymological connection between their names. This claim keeps popping up on Wikipedia articles that touch upon the Jasz even after repeated deletion. 2602:306:C4CE:9AF9:CCAA:709:3521:C041 (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply