Talk:Jason Emer
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Emer or someone from his office is deleting information
editThe information regarding Dr. Emers pending medical license revocation has been deleted twice. I believe he, or someone from his staff, is intentionally removing this information to hide it from the public. 128.23.128.26 (talk) 11:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Why It Needs to Be Deleted
edit1. It was moved from draft space to article space before it was reviewed and made live by the creator of the page
2. It was moved to draft space by other editors due to promotional tone, it seemed as it was written by someone closely connected to the subject
3. It was proposed for deletion and the final decision was to keep. However, the keep voters: 1 was a new account created just for this debate only (seems like it and it was an open IP, one was an editor banned for sock-puppetry)
4. There is someone constantly removing a section that is a bit negative about the subject
All this makes me believe that this page is being managed by someone closely connected to the subject. Additionally, i don't believe the subject is notable and most of the references are PRs and he is constantly self-promoting on the internet. He may become noteworthy enough later down the line but for now, the subject does not need to have a page on Wikipeda. Anyone who can make me understand why it should be kept, please let me know. I am very curious and believe i spotted a promotional activity on this platform.
WikiProCreate (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- It should be deleted, but if not, the information regarding the California trial and the suspension of his medical license should be included 128.23.255.9 (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)