Talk:Jason Eady

Latest comment: 6 years ago by NoahB in topic Lede

Lede edit

The text removed from the lede is extraneous and far from neutral. What Texas country music is is explained in the article Texas country music; it is not necessary to explain what a style of music is on the page of every musician who plays in that style. Saying he "is regarded as an important figure" is WP:WEASEL language. Calling it "classic country" is WP:PEACOCK, "bent on" is in no way neutral language, and portraying the movement as a "return to singer-songwriter roots" imposes an implicit point of view about what current (non-"classic") country is and how it has putatively erred in straying from some past paragon. All of this material is justifiably jettisoned. Chubbles (talk) 18:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there's an implied moral judgment on current country in saying texas country is an attempt to return to singer/songwriter roots—and it seems helpful to specify the genre rather than forcing people to click through the link. How is the change as a compromise?NoahB (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
"Classic" is an inherently non-neutral term - it is value-laden. If you want to explain what Texas country music is, the lede should describe the style in relation to the artist, not give a general overview of the genre - we should say how Eady evokes Texas country specifically. (By the same token, we wouldn't explain a genre in general in the lede for a screamo band or a chiptune producer or a soul jazz artist - the hyperlinks are there to guide the reader to that information.) I dug up some sourcing and rewrote the lede in a way that hopefully demonstrates what I mean. Chubbles (talk) 04:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
New lede works for me; thanks!NoahB (talk) 15:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply