Talk:Japanese destroyer Tsubaki (1944)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Zawed in topic GA Review
![]() | Japanese destroyer Tsubaki (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 27, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese destroyer Tsubaki (1944) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Tsubaki (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 11:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
I will get to this one in a few days. Zawed (talk) 11:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Pretty short and sweet, this is looking good. I only caught two issues:
- The namesake should be added on Tsubaki's first mention in the "Construction and career" section
- when they attacked target around: presumably it should be "targets"?
- Good catch--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- I also checked the image tags (they look OK), and there are no dupe links.
Cheers, Zawed (talk) 21:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking this one over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:14, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Looks good. Passing as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)